Aliens seem to have made things easy for people on Earth in The Seep. Tensions are no longer like incendiary tinderboxes, but are instead like waterlogged firearms. Traumatic memories are no longer sharp wounds. Happiness isn't hard to find. The novel asks the question, would the world be a better place if we didn’t experience pain or strenuousness while navigating life? In our times, when the pain is so severe, the easy answer would be yes. But The Seep says otherwise, and strangely, the best way it gets that point across is when the novel stumbles and makes mistakes.
The
Seep chronicles a world in which an
amorphous alien race called The Seep takes over the world. But not in a typical
dictatorial, dystopic fashion. Instead, The Seep…seeps into a person in various
forms, offering them a transformation that could be physical or mental or both.
All the flaws that a person finds in their physique can be rectified. Stressors
and fears are calmed. Memories that once brought painful jolts
become a lulling, pacifying fog. But in its place is a society that is at times
a uniform, sterile bore. For all the profundity on society The Seep doles
out, however, it has an equal dose of humor. The writing’s both simple and animated. The
book is novella-sized in word count, but has a novel-sized plot, moving at a
zippy pace, sometimes to its benefit, sometimes to its detriment.
The novel
focuses on the relationship between two characters: Deeba, and her girlfriend
Trina—the protagonist. They are almost a picture perfect couple. Trina’s only objections with the world don’t lie with her girlfriend, but with The Seep—an
alien race that believes all people are “one” regardless of gender or race. The
problem is that Trina changed her gender, because she wanted to be a specific
type of person, with all the minute changes it entails, and The Seep’s anodyne
belief of complete uniformity undermines and trivializes it. To top it all off,
her girlfriend, Deeba, redoes her life, starting again as a baby to strip
herself of all her traumatic memories. How is Trina supposed to
grieve, and experience authentic, uninhibited feelings when she lives in a
society where non-painful emotions are the only acceptable one? To say that
this makes her frustrated is an understatement. And that frustration imbues the
story with a propulsive fire.
It bears
mentioning that this book is quite absurd. Not in a grotesque or edgy way—it
toes the line between humor and impropriety. But if images like a dragon making
out with a person while high on an aphrodisiac turns you off, beware! The story
isn’t a far-reaching, save the world type of deal, either. It follows Trina
dealing with the end of her relationship, through a journey of self-discovery
and settled scores, as she struggles to decide whether relinquishing her pain
and history in lieu of uniformity is worth it.
The story
does lay out its answer to that question pretty thick. But the answer is made
even more clear by studying the book’s flaws. The most exciting parts of the
book happen when Trina is grappling with things that upend her beliefs, when
she hits brick walls in her pursuits, or when she’s at the brink of failure.
Those moments are aplenty, and like most conflict-centric parts of stories, are
predictably the best parts of the book. In other instances, Trina speeds
through her journey—jumping over potential threats like they’re narrow cracks
on the road. And interactions with a few supporting characters (the 200-ish
page count deprives many of the characters of fully formed development) are
skirted over, even when there are opportunities for conflict and discussion. These
moments are pleasant, but not gratifying. And I think that answers the book’s
question: breezy pleasantries are serviceable, but it’s the feeling and
memories of surmounting major hurdles, despite the stumbles you have along the
way that creates the best experiences. Pain is essential to the greatest
satisfaction.
The Math
Baseline
Score: 6/10
Bonuses: 1+ The humor sneaks up on you and works organically
in tandem with the drama.
+1 For having the more developed characters built on and described cleverly.
+1 For having the more developed characters built on and described cleverly.
Negatives: -1 The subtext often becomes text.
Nerd
Coefficient: 7/10
POSTED BY: Sean
Dowie - Screenwriter, stand-up comedian, lover of all books that make him nod
his head and say, "Neat!