Showing posts with label Julia Rios. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Julia Rios. Show all posts

Monday, June 15, 2020

Interview: Fireside Magazine



Congratulations to Julia Rios and Elsa Sjunneson at Fireside Magazine, for their Hugo nomination for Best SemiProZine!

Fireside Magazine started in 2012, and since then has grown into a monthly magazine, a website with weekly fiction and non-fiction, a podcast, and a quarterly digest, among other accomplishments.  Fireside prides themselves on their two major publishing goals: To find and publish great stories regardless of genre, and to pay their artists and writers well.

Fireside may have started small back in the day, but the magazine has grown quickly. In 2016 they added a third goal to their mission: To resist the global rise of fascism and far-right populism; and later that year the magazine published the eye-opening #BlackSpecFic special report. Fireside has featured fiction, essays, and poetry by Nghi Vo, Karen Osborne, Brandon O'Brien, Izzy Wasserstein, Sheree Renée Thomas, Jacqui Talbot, and Charles Payseur, to name just a few.

Elsa Sjunneson won a Hugo in 2019 for the Uncanny Magazine special issue Disabled People Destroy Science Fiction, and she has also won the Aurora and British Fantasy award. Sjunneson's work has appeared in Uncanny, Tor.com, The Boston Globe, and elsewhere. She has taught workshops with Clarion West and Writing the Other, and has presented work at The University of Chicago and The Henry Art Gallery. Her debut memoir, Alone in the Light, will be released in 2021. You can learn more about Sjunneson and her work by visiting her website, snarkbat.com or by following her on twitter, @snarkbat.

Julia Rios won the Hugo in 2017 and 2018 for her work with Uncanny Magazine, and she co-edited Kaleidoscope: Diverse YA Science Fiction and Fantasy Stories, which won the Aurelius Award and the Ditmar Award.   Rios' work has appeared in Apex Magazine, Daily Science Fiction, Lightspeed, and elsewhere. She is a co-founder of FuenteCo, which fosters hybridity in writing and other arts. Julia is a co-host at the Hugo nominated Skiffy and Fanty Show, and if you've listened to Podcastle, Cast of Wonders, Pseudopod, or the Strange Horizons podcast, there is a good chance you heard her voice as the narrator. You can learn more about Rios at her website, juliarios.com, or by following her on twitter, @omgjulia.

Elsa Sjunneson and Julia Rios were kind enough to answer my questions about their editorial voices, their own editing, special issues and important essays, among other fascinating topics. Let's get to the interview!


NOAF: Can you tell us about your role at Fireside Magazine? How did you get involved with the magazine?

Elsa Sjunesson: I started as a slush reader for Brian White back in I think 2014? I was there a long time! I then moved on to being the Assistant Editor, and when Brian White stepped down in 2017 I was promoted to Managing Editor. In all these roles I was a part of maintaining the voice and values of the magazine. I learned so much at Fireside and I’m proud of having spent the time there becoming the editor that I am today.

Julia Rios: I took over as Fiction Editor in 2017 when Brian White stepped down, and I edited all the fiction and poetry and essays (with the exception of those essays Elsa edited!) through the end of 2019.

NOAF: You are both award winning editors, for your work with anthologies (among other projects). How is editing a monthly magazine different from editing an anthology?

ES: As a managing editor it's a very different process. My job was less to edit (in the places where I did edit it was non-fiction work), but to help shepherd the magazine through the editorial process, from submissions, to the editorial selection process, and through copyedits. I was the person who kept an eye on the piece all the way to publication.

JR: Anthologies are complete units and have their own specific needs and voices and so on. Magazines are ongoing, so while they tend to have distinct voices, there is also room to explore and evolve over time. You can do a theme issue in a magazine without making a definitive statement about what the magazine is as a whole. For instance, in 2019, I did a Mexicanx theme issue for the month of September and a ghost theme issue for the month of October, but Fireside is not all ghosts or Mexicanx content all the time the way that an Ellen Datlow ghost story anthology is or A Larger Reality, the Mexicanx Initiative anthology edited by Libia Brenda was.

NOAF: Every magazine has its own editorial voice, as does each individual editor. What is Fireside's editorial voice, and what do you, personally, look for in submissions?

JR: When I came on board, Brian told me that he always wanted the stories to be gripping stories with beginnings, middles, and ends. I started from there, but as I stayed on the editorial voice evolved to include things like poetry. Elsa was invaluable as managing editor because she understood what kinds of things I was looking for and helped me choose stories. We had a shared vision for uplifting underrepresented voices. I’m not sure what the next editors' visions are, but I respect their other editorial work.

ES: Julia said everything I wanted to say, but I'll add this: at Fireside the goal from my first day to my last day was to give underrepresented authors a chance to shine.

NOAF: What pieces in Fireside are you particularly proud of?

ES: I want to step away from my direct editorial work to talk about the writing I did as an editor for Fireside for a second. One of the most important conversations that I started in our industry is the conversation about the use of the word "blind" as a publishing term. My piece "Blind Reading Is in Braille or Large Print" resulted in a lot of changes to the submissions statements of several magazines and I'm proud of using the space Fireside afforded me to create change.

JR: I genuinely love all the pieces I worked on. One of the great joys of editing is getting to work with awesome writers and share stories you love with the world. Of course I was extremely proud of Phenderson Djélì Clark's "The Secret Lives of the Nine Negro Teeth of George Washington" winning awards. Phenderson is an amazing writer, and we have seen more from him since then and I am sure we will see a lot more in the future. 2019 was the first year that Fireside provided audio versions of the texts, something that Elsa and I had advocated for because we cared a lot about accessibility. It was also the first year the magazine published poetry, which happened because Meg Frank, our marketing director at the time, shared my love of poetry and advocated for including it. We started out with an incredibly strong poem by Sabrina Vourvoulias. "Teeth" is … dare I say… biting? Okay, but seriously, it's a hard and sharp examination of the Latinx immigrant experience in the United States after 2016. On top of that, "Teeth" is beautiful and musical in its language. In 2019, I did my first translation work, translating a few stories from Spanish into English. I mentioned the September 2019 Mexicanx theme issue, and I am very proud of that one. I'm also proud of the essays by Layla Al-Bedawi (on losing native language fluency) and Elsa Sjunneson (on becoming a guide dog handler). I could go on indefinitely here. I was incredibly lucky to work with many brilliant writers, all of whom honored me by trusting me with their words.

NOAF: How is Fireside different from other projects and magazines that you have been involved with?

JR: Every publication is unique. I can't really find a good way to compare them to each other. Fireside was the first print magazine I worked with, though, so I suppose that is the easiest measure.

ES:  Right now I'm working at Uncanny Magazine as the non-fiction editor, which is very different because I am not dealing with the magazine protocols so much as my authors' words. It's definitely a different job, but one I'm enjoying!

NOAF: Four times a year, Fireside publishes a gorgeously designed print edition. How do the editorial and design processes differ, if at all, between the digital and print editions?

JR: I never handled anything to do with the design. My job was to select the texts and work with authors to refine them until we all agreed they were as strong as we could make them. The biggest difference came when Fireside started publishing a print issue each quarter because that was a change from the monthly issue ebooks that were available. This meant I had to think about how the contents of each month fit together (as usual), while also thinking about how each three month period worked.

ES: One of the challenges for me on print was that I am blind, so I definitely struggled with print, and the ability to navigate what was on the page versus what was on the site. I stayed on the site side of the process as a result. We did do a couple of pieces that were designed to do different things in print and online, notably Sarah Gailey's "STET" and Fran Wilde’s "Choose Wisely". We had discussions as a team about how to articulate a vision of each piece effectively for our audience, with varying degrees of success.

NOAF:  Thank you so much Julia and Elsa!

POSTED BY: Andrea Johnson lives in Michigan with her husband and too many books. She can be found on twitter, @redhead5318 , where she posts about books, food, and assorted nerdery.
 

Wednesday, June 12, 2019

Reading the Hugos: Related Work

Welcome back to Reading the Hugos. Today we continue our series on the 2019 finalists with a look at Related Work.
3.3.6: Best Related Work. Any work related to the field of science fiction, fantasy, or fandom, appearing for the first time during the previous calendar year or which has been substantially modified during the previous calendar year, and which is either non-fiction or, if fictional, is noteworthy primarily for aspects other than the fictional text, and which is not eligible in any other category
Related Work is a bit of a catch-all category. It’s for work that is primarily non fiction and that is related to science fiction and fantasy, and which is not otherwise eligible elsewhere on the ballot. This is how you can have an encyclopedia compete against a folk album against a podcast against a collection of essays about movies (this was in 2012 when the Fancast category had not yet been created. That particular lineup of finalists can’t happen today. You may also note that albums and songs have been included in Dramatic Presentation – because the two Clipping albums in question are narrative driven whereas Seanan McGuire’s Wicked Girls was not.). There may also be a single blog post competing and winning in the category. Or a series of blog posts focusing on the women of Harry Potter. In the case of this year there is a four way biography, a series of interviews, a three part documentary, a collected essay series about the Hugo Awards, a recognition of the work done by a website, and the experience of bringing together Mexicanx fans and creators to Worldcon. Related Work is an interesting cross section of another side of the genre and another side of fandom.

Let’s take a look at the finalists.



Archive of Our Own, a project of the Organization for Transformative Works
Astounding: John W. Campbell, Isaac Asimov, Robert A. Heinlein, L. Ron Hubbard, and the Golden Age of Science Fiction, by Alec Nevala-Lee (Dey Street Books)
The Hobbit Duology (documentary in three parts), written and edited by Lindsay Ellis and Angelina Meehan (YouTube)
An Informal History of the Hugos: A Personal Look Back at the Hugo Awards, 1953-2000, by Jo Walton (Tor)
www.mexicanxinitiative.com: The Mexicanx Initiative Experience at Worldcon 76 (Julia Rios, Libia Brenda, Pablo Defendini, John Picacio)
Ursula K. Le Guin: Conversations on Writing, by Ursula K. Le Guin with David Naimon (Tin House Books)






Conversations on Writing: In an effort to have one more opportunity to honor Ursula K. Le Guin, it seems that the members of Worldcon will nominate anything with her name on it. Conversations on Writing is a more ancillary work to science fiction and fantasy (it occasionally mentions works of science fiction, but the real tie here is Le Guin herself), but I'm not sure this is one of the top "Related Works" of 2018.




The Hobbit Duology: Just like the Hobbit films were originally planned to be two movies before being stretched to three, this documentary from Lindsay Ellis and Angelina Meehan is likewise a three part feature - though at least here Ellis and Meehan have a more tightly constructed plan that anyone involved in the 2012-2014 movies. Has it only been five years?

I appreciated the dive into why the three Hobbit movies were so disappointing, but it was the further investigation into how the the films came to be split into three and the legal issues tied to the production and and the filming in New Zealand. I don't admire it as much as I do some of the other works on this ballot, but it is a worthy finalist.




Archive of Our Own: I was enthused to see Archive of Our Own on the Hugo Award ballot. Related Work can be a tricky category to figure out and there is a propensity to treat the Related Work as “best non-fiction book” with limited exceptions in most other years. I’ve had Archive of Our Own on my nominating ballot for the last several years because I believe it is important to honor, celebrate, and recognize the importance of AO3 in the genre community and the only place where that is possible within the framework of the Hugo Awards is in Related Work.

Archive of Our Own is known as a significant fan fiction site, a repository for a massive amount of fan writing. The AO3 contribution in the Voter's Packet is descriptive as to what AO3 is, but a page on AO3's website is much more comprehensive for the breadth of what they do. The fan writing and the fan fiction is an important part of the genre (though one that I do not directly participate in), but how the Organization for Transformative Works operates AO3 is key for the nomination. The ease of the new filtering and tagging systems, inclusiveness, and the overall breadth of the AO3 experience is part of why it is such an importance resource. .



The Mexicanx Initiative Experience: Before the Voter's Packet was released, I was curious how The Mexicanx Initiative could possibly be represented in consideration for the Hugo Award given that what we are honoring here is the experience of the 50 selected recipients attendance at Worldcon 76 in San Diego. It wasn't a book or a film or a story or a discrete work that didn't fit into a category. We're honoring an event, which is definitely related to the field of science fiction, fantasy, or fandom, and absolutely does not fit into any other category. I attended that Worldcon, at least of the periphery, but I was not part of the Experience and while I included it on my ballot, I wasn't sure how in what way I would be able to consider it for the actual Hugo Award.

There are two major pieces of work in the Voter's Packet. The first is the closest readers are going to come to getting to the heart of what the Experience was actually about and what it might have been like for the attendees, as well as the impact it is likely to have on the field as a whole - which is a Scrapbook. The Scrapbook is a series of interviews with the attendees, essays, recipes, and more. Reading through, I got more of the real community impact of the Experience and how important it was to the attendees. The other work included in the packet is an anthology of fiction from the Mexicanx Initiative attendees, but the real consideration here is the Scrapbook and the overall experience of the attendees.

The Mexicanx Initiative was a vital part of science fiction and fantasy fandom in 2018 and I hope it is something that we will be able to look back on as a landmark moment that moved and pushed fandom.



An Informal History of the Hugos: I was already familiar with the essays collected in An Informal History of the Hugos when the book was published last year. I followed Jo Walton's essays when she originally wrote as part of an essay series for Tor.com from 2010 to 2013 and not that I'm nostalgic for the good old days (such as they are), but dipping into this collection one essay at a time is likely a more productive way to read the essays instead of mainlining them right into your head - which is what I'm doing this time around.

If you're into the history of science fiction and fantasy, and especially of the Hugo Awards and conversations about how the finalists have held up over the years and what the members of Worldcon might have missed, this is the book for you. It is a delight, it has greatly expanded my reading list, and it has me contemplating a similar project of my own. That's the delight of An Informal History of the Hugos - it is a personal history of the Hugo Awards through the lens of a writer steeped in the history of the genre.



Astounding: The names John W. Campbell, Isaac Asimov, Robert A. Heinlein, and L. Ron Hubbard are names which loom large over the history of science fiction and fantasy, but for me, for the most part, they are just names. Legends. Oh, I've read my share of Asimov and the occasional Heinlein, but these are not the formative figures of my childhood, or of the early years of my introduction to the genre. Campbell is a name of genre legend helping to usher in the "Golden Age" of science fiction and Hubbard is known as the founder of scientology and for having his 1986 novel Black Genesis illegitimately gamed onto the Hugo Awards ballot the following year. But knowing the broad strokes of something is not knowing the story.

Alec Nevala-Lee puts Campbell at the center of the story of all four men in a well researched account that neither pulls punches or let's anyone off the hook. These were heady days in the explosion of science fiction and fantasy and these are towering figures in the genre's history. Astounding is a top notch biography, one of the class of the year.



My Vote
1. Astounding
2. An Informal History of the Hugos
3. The Mexicanx Initiative Experience
4. Archive of Our Own
5. The Hobbit Duology
6. Conversations on Writing


Our Previous Coverage
Novel
Novella
Novelette
Short Story


Joe Sherry - Co-editor of Nerds of a Feather, 3x Hugo Award Finalist for Best Fanzine. Minnesotan.