Showing posts with label Mars. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mars. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 9, 2025

Film Review: Lost in Starlight

 This Korean animated film on Netflix straddles rom-com and space adventure


Lost in Starlight begins on Mars, with an astronaut in a busy, vibrant housing facility for the team members recording a message to her daughter back on Earth. On the wall of her bunk, she has a small crayon drawing of an astronaut that her daughter made for her, and a vinyl record hanging up. But during the recording, a tremor shatters the entire facility, collapsing it on all of the astronauts inside, killing the entire crew.

Fast-forward some 25 years, and we meet the now-grown daughter who was to receive that message -- Nan-young. Despite losing her mom in that tragedy on Mars, Nan-young has pursued a career at NASA, as well, and she plans on being a member of the crew that will make humanity's first return voyage to the Red Planet since her mom and the others were lost. But her supervisors are worried about her -- not because she seems to emotional, but because she doesn't seem emotional enough.NASA removes her from the mission, believing that she never fully processed the loss of her mother, and that the psychological effects of arriving on Mars might prove overwhelming or unpredictable.

Upset by losing her spot on the team, Nan-young begins going through some of her mother's things, and finds an old, broken record player that she had decorated with crayon drawings as a child. She tries to find a repair shop that can tackle the record player, but has no luck until she literally bumps into Jay as she's going into a store and he's coming out. The record player falls to the ground, and Jay says he repairs machines like that. Some coincidence.

As Nan-young and Jay begin spending more time together, she opens up to him about how much she loves music, and one song in particular really helped get her through the long nights of studying in college. But she got the song off of a file-sharing site, and never knew who the artist was. She begins playing the song, and Jay confesses that he actually wrote the song with his old band, and he never knew anyone had heard it. Again, some coincidence.

As Nan-young continues her scientific work at NASA, she encourages Jay to get back with his old band and explore writing and performing again. He's reluctant to do so, but does reconnect with his old band mates, and agrees to play guitar live. Then suddenly, Nan-young makes a breakthrough involving plant-life on Mars, and earns a spot back on the crew. The public announcement goes out before she can tell Jay, and his feelings are hurt, leading to a rift before the mission.

Once the Mars mission begins, the film begins intercutting between their two narratives. Nan-young has to do a reconnaissance mission on the surface, and a windstorm comes up, seeparating her from the rest of the crew, shorting out her coms, and threatening her oxygen supply. Back on Earth, Jay has agreed to play and sing with the band at a festival date, and since he hasn't sung on stage in years, he's really nervous.So, one character is literally fighting for her life on an alien planet, and the other...has stage fright. 

This is where the movie lost me. The stacking up of coincidences early in the film was a little clunky, but I could get over it. For a good portion of the movie, it does play much more like a romantic comedy with a bit of sci-fi flavor on the periphery, so if it hewed a little more closely to rom-com meet-cute conventions, it didn't feel out of place. And the movie does a couple interesting things with the idea of the bifurcation of self in the face of past trauma, and finding ways out of that. But the climactic juxtaposition of a literal life-or-death, high-drama space adventure vs. taking a deep breath and singing a song in front of what looks to be about 100 people...it just didn't track for me.

In the end, I found myself reminded of movies that plowed similar ground, but which I enjoyed much more. Movies like The Martian or Your Name, where in the former dealt with survival on Mars and the latter with romantic partners trying to communicate across impossible distances, felt like they were big inspirations for a lot of the action of the film, and though I was reminded of them, Lost in Starlight never resonated with me the way those films did. Even First Man, about Neil Armstrong trying to compartmentalize his child's death while embarking on the moon mission, felt a little more emotionally impactful while dealing with very similar material.

--

Nerds coefficient: 6/10

Posted by Vance K - resident cult-film reviewer and co-founder of nerds of a feather, flock together 

Thursday, January 4, 2024

Microreview: The Mars House, by Natasha Pulley

 A political thriller that suffers from the strictures of science fiction as a genre


Natasha Pulley’s work tends to run to type: Delicately drawn queer relationships, exquisite images evoking the unknowability of (super)natural forces, an unmoored approach to time, and plots focusing on conquest and colonialism that usually involve Britain at one end or the other. The Mars House, a science fiction political thriller set on Mars, would seem like a striking departure from this mold, and yet, at its core, nearly all of Pulley’s key interests are represented. The problem is that what works beautifully in historical fiction tinged with the fantastic does not translate well to science fiction.

The book centers around January Stirling, a ballet dancer from England who must flee a flooded London as a climate refugee. The city of Tharsis, a Martian colony, is always looking for new people, and make a practice of taking in climate refugees like January. But people who have grown up on Earth are three times stronger than natural Martian citizens, due to the gravity differential, and because they do not know how to moderate their strength, they are deadly additions to society. One in 267 Earthborn people kills a Martian by accident every year, on account of their strength—a statistic that takes familiar arguments about immigration and gives them a decidedly fresh twist. It’s one thing to insist that taking in refugees is a humane and decent thing to do, or to show how immigration results in a net positive economic impact. It’s quite another when the cost of such policies is measurable in lives.

Tharsis has coped with this uneasy balance by creating a two-tiered society. At the top are natural or naturalized Martians: those who were born on the planet, or have undergone a grueling and not-entirely-safe medical procedure to render their physiology comparable to more fragile Martian norms. The underclass are the ‘Earthstrong’, people like January, whose comparative robustness makes them valuable workers in jobs like manufacturing, where manual labour and brute strength are valuable, but who are still seen as a peril in shops or on public transit. They are legally required to wear resistance cages, a metal mechanism that resists their movement in a manner evocative of Harrison Bergeron, reducing their strength to Mars-normal. Regulations restrict their movement: they can remove their cages only in certain places, under clearly defined circumstances. Public service messaging reinforces these regulations in dehumanizing language.

This strength-related division between Earthstrong and Tharses is bolstered by a gender-related divide. The Tharsese have done away with social gender entirely. Everyone is ‘they’. To a Martian, gendered language is rude, uncouth. It evoke back-alley thuggery, because on Mars gendered pronouns are only used by Earthstrongers, for Earthstrongers. Oh—and for animals. A Martian cannot be ‘he’ or ‘she’, but a dog or an Earthstronger can be. Again, immigrants are dehumanized.

Within this society, January Stirling makes a home for himself. He wears his cage obediently, works diligently in a factory to manufactor water from biowaste at a molecular level, and struggles to support himself in a grey market economy that runs on energy credits, since unnaturalized Martians are shut out of the currency economy. Then, in an unfortunate example of politics staining everything it touches, he catches the attention of Aubrey Gale, a militantly anti-refugee Tharsese politician on the rise. As a political stunt, Gale invites January to enter into a temporary political marriage, and January—now out of work and unable to support himself---has no other option but to agree. (This is rather typical of Pulley, whose queer relationships almost always feature a decidedly unhealthy imbalance of power.) From there, plottery ensues: explosions and dinner parties, talking mammoths and almost-ghosts, mysteriously missing persons and maybe-murdered marital predecessors, and a great deal of immigration policy and political intrigue in all directions.

The real strength of this book is, I think, the politics of immigration in this Tharsese context. Pulley has always been quite interested in culture clash and colonization, and the interplanetary setting here allows her the freedom to explore familiar ideas in novel ways. By making Earthstrongers genuinely dangerous to indigenous Martians, Pulley neatly balances the two sides of an argument that most left-leaning readers of SFF would see as laughably unbalanced in its real-world incarnation. The world presented here has no good solutions: Earth’s climate crisis is catastrophically bad, and Mars has room. Yet Earthstrong people are genuinely dangerous, and the more of them arrive on Mars, the more they will threaten the Tharsese. Yet on Mars itself, they are an underclass, forced either to physically hamper themselves, or else undergo debilitating, irreversable medical procedures for the sake of reaping the benefits of Tharses citizenship. Integrating the two populations cannot be made safe or equitable. Segregating them into separate settlements would only create two groups who must share limited resources, one of which is vastly stronger than the other—an imbalance that will not end well.

On top of this quite sophisticated political world-building, there are also beautiful references to her earlier books. A reference to the Peruvian Andes is, I think, an Easter egg for readers who read The Bedlam Stacks (the finest of Pulley’s books, in my opinion). At one point a character pulls out a cell phone that is a family heirloom, a Mori cell phone. Mori is the name of the titular character from The Watchmaker of Filligree Street, and the idea that his craft would have evolved from 19th century watchmaking to 21st century cell phone manufacturing is a lovely connector between the very different worlds in Pulley’s books. (It’s also rather a nice touch that a key mark of the quality of Mori craftsmanship is that the cell phones can be easily taken apart so that damaged parts can be swapped out to effect repairs. *coughcoughApplecoughcough*)

Other characteristically Pulleyan touches abound, but with less delicacy or success than in her previous books. The growing intimacy between January and Gale is the core of their character arcs, but it feels a bit forced. Part of that might be the quite tropey marriage-of-convenience plot device. Part of it might be the fact that January has internalized the anti-Earthstrong sentiment to a distressing degree of self-loathing, which makes his growing feelings for Gale—a rabid anti-Earthstronger, remember—seem less like affection and more like another representation of that self-loathing. 

The evocation of the ineffable power of natural forces, too, is present, but less satisfying. For example, water is a scarce commodity on Mars—hence January’s job at the factory manufacturing it—but Gale’s family has made its fortune extracting it from the atmosphere. Several scenes take place among a plantation of solar mirrors, which power Tharsis, while also warming the surrounding air and nurturing a pine forest. The microclimate generates mist, and nearby is a herd of genetically reconstituted mammoths, who can communicate with humans. Some veery evocative imagery, to be sure, but also a little bit silly.

I think that the problem with this book lies almost entirely its use of science fictional devices, rather than fantasy, to generate these otherworldly touches. Because with science fiction things must be explained, and explained in a way that makes sense. And these explanations simply don’t. Take, for example, the misty forest: It’s misty, we’re told, because the air is warmer around the solar collectors. But how can that work? Mist precipitates when the amount of water vapor grows too high for the air to hold. But warm air can hold more water than cold air. This is why dew collects at night: the air cools down, and water precipates out. This is also why winter air is dry: even if the outside air is fully saturated with water, once we warm it up indoors we increase its capacity to hold water, and so its relative humidity will plummet. Now consider Mars: It’s so dry that water must be created at a molecular level in massive solar-powered factories. Warming up the air is going to make the problem worse. So where does the water come from, to saturate this warmed air so completely that mist appears?

Consider, too, the cages that Earthstrongers must wear. Their mechanism, we are told, is to resist muscular movement, which prevents an overly enthusiastic gesture from taking off a Martian’s head. (While we’re at it, I’m a little perplexed at the frequency of limb-removal being attributed to Earthstrongers. Certainly bones and muscles will be weaker, but I have difficulty seeing how life in low-gravity weakens tendons and ligaments enough that someone of typical Earth stature can rip off a Martian’s leg. If you'll forgive a gruesome comparison, I do not believe it is the case that one in 267 preschool teachers accidentally dismembers a toddler every year.) The cages counteract movement; they do not change anything about the internal density or composition of an Earthstronger’s body. So how is it that a fall in Martian gravity is harmless to an Earthstronger who is not wearing a cage, but deadly to an Earthstronger who is wearing a cage? How is it that a crowd-repelling water hose can be shrugged off by an Earthstronger who is not wearing a cage, but will sweep away an Earthstronger who is wearing a cage?  The Earthstrong muscle and bone density are not going anywhere. The narrative purpose of the cages is clear: make Earthstrongers like Martians. But the mechanism that we are given simply doesn’t match the effect that they are intended to generate.

There are lots of examples of this: ideas that are evocative and useful for plotting and pacing and tension and stakes, but which simply don't work if you're trying to come up with a science-fictional type solution for them. With Pulley's approach to fantasy, she can leave it in the misty background, generating spectacular stories that aren’t dragged down by mechanics or unconvincing science. With SF, she can't. 

So, in sum, this is not Pulley's best work. Nevertheless, I devoured it in a day, and will devour her next, because even Pulley's not-best work is still pretty good stuff.

Highlights

Nerd coefficient: 6/10, still enjoyable, but the flaws are hard to ignore

  • Mars

  • Politics of immigration and gender

  • Queer-normal society

  • Unconvincing SF mechanics

CLARA COHEN lives in Scotland in a creaky old building with pipes for gas lighting still lurking under her floorboards. She is an experimental linguist by profession, and calligrapher and Islamic geometric artist by vocation. During figure skating season she does blather on a bit about figure skating. She is on Mastodon at wandering.shop/@ergative.

References: 

Pulley, Natasha. The Mars House. [Bloomsbury Publishing, 2024].

Monday, April 18, 2016

Microreview [film]: Angry Red Planet


It's a Misfits cover! and space philosophy! And embarrassing gender norms! 

If you're a fan of The Misfits and remember the giant spider-crab-thing on the cover of Walk Among Us, welp, that's from Angry Red Planet, and it's what got me to watch Angry Red Planet

In a lot of ways, this movie is your standard dose of 1950s sci-fi, except everything has an exclamation point after it. The opening Army-types-around-a-table-explaining-everything scene is like the one you've seen a million times, but the science is all a little more made-up sounding, the uncomprehending stares are a little extra confused, and the marching orders are just a bit more incomprehensible than usual. It's a truly fantastic scene.

So, look. I'm writing this review in a Vegas diner, which is kind of perfect, because Vegas is like America with an exclamation point. And I think "America With an Exclamation Point...In Space!" could have been the tagline of this movie. But what I can't figure out is if the filmmakers did that on purpose.

You've got heedless destruction — to test their freeze ray, the astronauts blithely destroy some native Martian vegetation and then cheer when it shatters like glass. Their first reaction upon seeing alien life is to blast it! Blast it!!!! You've got upsetting gender assumptions — the female astronaut thinks she must be nervous as one of the first four people on a new planet "because she's a woman." You've got the fetishizing of guns — the guy who gets to wield the freeze gun loves it, and pets it, and damn near calls it George. 

But the most remarkable thing about this movie is the goddamn bats. No. Not the bats. The neon. Wait...sorry. Almost. Vegas, you know? You know how in The Martian it looks like Matt Damon's on Mars? Well in Angry Red Planet it looks like they're in a picture taken at The Bellagio gardens and then ruined by Photoshop filters. 

Dubbed the "Cinemagic Process," all the scenes on Mars appear to be dyed red. It's not actually that simple — I couldn't figure out exactly what was happening. Suffice to say somebody went wild with the Filter Gallery back when that could only be achieved photochemically. It's legitimately captivating.

But all of this, like Las Vegas itself, begs the question of who is in on the joke? See, it's one thing to watch this movie and think, "Damn! It's a miracle we didn't blow ourselves all up!" But at the end of the movie (Spoilers? I don't know. Probably not.) the astronauts decode a message from the Martians that says Earthlings (read: "Americans") are "scientific adults but intellectual children." 

For as much as this movie echoes the themes of other, better movies, this is maybe — given the hindsight provided by history — the most clear-eyed assessment of 1950s America that I've heard. But it's impossible to tell if everything that has come before in this movie was designed to reinforce that idea, or was in spite of it.

Maybe I'll ask the ghost of Hunter Thompson.

The Math

Objective Quality: 6/10

Bonuses: +1 for the dialogue in the opening scene; +1 for being on a Misfits album cover; +1 for Cinemagic!

Penalties: -1 for that "I'm just a woman" line; -1 for the miraculous "we just did all this amazing stuff off-screen!" ending

Cult film coefficient: 7/10. It'll scratch your classic sci-fi itch, but it's not going to earn a place on your "Classic Sci-Fi" shelf of DVDs

Posted by Vance K — cult film reviewer er and co-editor of nerds of a feather since 2012.


Wednesday, November 12, 2014

Microreview [book]: War Dogs, by Greg Bear

Commendable Attention to Logistics, Lamentably Lackluster Ending

Bear, Greg. War Dogs. Orbit, 2014.
Buy it here.

Irrelevant Note: while reading this, I just could not shake the feeling that the true title is, or should be, "War Bears" by Greg Dog. I confess to a glimmer of disappointment that this is not the case. But be that as it may...

Finally, a story about Mars that doesn't demand total suspension of disbelief! Bear has carefully crafted a tale that is both consistently entertaining to read, thanks to the snappy dialogue and descriptions, and yet also serious about exploring the practical difficulties that would ensue in a near-future interplanetary war. It's a scenario in which technology is much more advanced than today but not unrecognizably so, and logistical problems like supplying air, water and weapons to the "Skyrines" landing on Mars to fight the Bad Aliens on behalf of the mysterious Good Aliens have been taken seriously. It was a refreshing change to read a story that doesn't simply skip all that pesky logistics by concocting some pseudo-scientific, deus ex machina uber-tech solution (FTL drives! Ansibles!), but instead delves into the nitty-gritty about how in seven hells one could possibly arrange to fight anywhere but on Earth.

We follow a not-as-dumb-as-he-seems-but-still-kind-of-dumb protagonist, Michael Venn, through his adventures on Mars, which he narrates mostly in the historical present, but this chronological retelling is complicated by periodic cut-scenes, so to speak, to the true present, back on Earth, where he is trying to make sense of all that happened. I know this is a common literary device, and I further acknowledge that in the vast majority of stories the survival of the main character(s) is never seriously in doubt, but I still have qualms about it, since why remove all hint of suspense about the main character's ultimate fate? That said, I can't get on Bear's case too much, since I don't have the faintest idea how to tell the sort of tale he's telling in any other way but this suspense-less split-time approach or the plodding, 'chronological order' method.

It is hard not to empathize with Venn and the other Skyrines as they land right in the middle of a planet-sized SNAFU, and as they (and we) spend the rest of the story trying to figure out what's gone wrong and why, and who they can trust (pretty much nobody, of course). But while the story requires considerably less disbelief than most that deal with the Red Planet ("Quaaaaid...start the reactor—free Maaaars!" and whatnot), certain elements felt like false notes in an otherwise pleasant melody. 


Whatever other objections to War Dogs you might muster, at least it had no Weird Stuff As Hard To Believe As It Is Creepy!

First off, is there any force in the universe that could convince people to stop saying Foxtrot Uniform Charlie Kilo (if you know what I mean)? And given all the advanced tech granted us Earthlings by the Gurus, and the importance of the Skyrines' mission to and on Mars, it seems unlikely, to say the least, that Venn would have made it back to Earth yet avoided being mobbed by the rich and powerful, and all by means of the simplest subterfuge regarding his identity. There were other false notes here and there, but I dare not say more since I am already teetering on the edge of blabbing about the Big Reveal.

The ending to the book was surprisingly anticlimactic, even considering it's obviously intended to be only the first installment in a larger story arc/series, and I expected rather more from sci fi veteran Bear, who judging from his other work certainly knows how to close the deal story-wise. But Bear handled most aspects of this intriguing story very well indeed, and has, in me, a reader eager to devour subsequent books on Venn and his decidedly unusual life!


The Math


Objective assessment: 6/10

Bonuses: +1 for witty banter, +1 for taking the practical/logistical science involved in the story seriously (so no tech-as-magic solutions, except maybe for the cryogenic goop)

Penalties: -1 for the 'not with a bang but a whimper' ending, 1st book of a trilogy notwithstanding

Nerd coefficient: 7/10 "An enjoyable experience, but not without its flaws"

[See here for more info about why a 7/10 is 'a bit of alright,' as my Aussie friends might say!]

Zhaoyun, longtime connoisseur of the finest SF/F (plus, it must be admitted, a bunch of not the finest SF/F, e.g., I keep watching The 100 even though I know it's a steaming pile of crap), has provoked literally dozens of laughs, guffaws or energetic chuckles worldwide since beginning to write for Nerds of a Feather in 2013.