Showing posts with label J.R.R. Tolkien. Show all posts
Showing posts with label J.R.R. Tolkien. Show all posts

Thursday, October 19, 2023

Review: The Fall of Gondolin, by J R R Tolkien (edited by Christopher Tolkien)

The last of the Christopher Tolkien volumes on the work of his father, is a fascinating look at one of the key stories of the Legendarium, but one not suited to audio.


Christopher Tolkien had made a long career and life excavating and examining his father’s work and writings. The richness and the variance, the contradictions, changes, revisions and rethinking make the Legendarium something that volumes of scholarship, analysis and critical thought can be and has been, applied to.


The Fall of Gondolin is the last of Christopher Tolkien’s efforts in this regard. It sits at the last of a trilogy of volumes (Children of Hurin, Beren and Luthien and this, The Fall of Gondolin) that were published after his more mainline and extremely comprehensive volumes on the History of Middle Earth (12 volumes!). The Fall of Gondolin tackles the end of the last major kingdom of elves in the Second Age, as Morgoth waxes to his greatest power over Middle Earth, nearly gaining complete dominion over it in the wake of the destruction of the city, the scattering of its inhabitants, the loss of its treasures.It is a story that is, fundamentally, a tragedy (just as Children of Hurin is)


Gondolin is one of the great places of Middle Earth. When you think of the places and locations in Middle Earth, you think of The Shire, and Rivendell. The Cave of Smaug. The Wood King’s Hall and Caves. Lothlorien. Edoras. Minas Tirith


Add to that Gondolin. Gondolin is the OG Elven Hidden City of Beauty in the Second Age. One cannot compare Gondolin to any place in Valinor. But as far as locales in Middle Earth, it is the shining, yet hidden star of Elvish power, grace and beauty that, really, Lothlorien and Rivendell as small, poor fragments of. Even while it is a hidden city, the path to it kept from Morgoth at price and consequence, it is still a city that is not under siege, it is a city that one can almost forget the dangers and dark of the world outside of the vale in which it sits. Gondolin, sitting in a valley, with some hills, and ringed by protective mountains, evoked for me a place that I suspect that Tolkien would have never considered or contemplated--Kathmandu, Nepal.


But, perhaps there was something in the water. Although it came out in 1933, after Tolkien started writing himself, one might also contemplate Shangri-La, the novel and the subsequent movie Lost Horizon. But there is a steel in the velvet of Gondolin, for the Elves know that Morgoth is searching endlessly, and when he finds the city, the fall will be terrible and the beauty of it destroyed. The Elves won’t give it up without struggle.


And so, like Shangri La, Gondolin hides and waits, a spark of beauty that shines and yet is hidden.


I did make a mistake in picking this book to read. Not because I have not read the other two volumes. Not because of any dislike for Tolkien or the like, far from it. And not because of any lack of grounding for it--readers of this blog will recall my review of The Silmarillion in audio. And there is where the problem lay, dear reader. Following that pleasant experience, I, dear reader, decided to consume this book in audio.


I was under a misapprehension, and stubborn as I am, I did not decide to change course. I had thought that, unlike the History of Middle Earth volumes, that The Fall of Gondolin was a straightforward smoothed and put together narrative of Tolkien’s notes by his son, to provide a single and cohesive story. I was even prepared for invention and gap-filling by his son, because, as anyone who knows more than the bare basics can tell you, the only complete and published works in the Legendarium ARE The Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit. The Silmarillion is the next closest thing to that but it is a hodgepodge of texts.


But what The Fall of Gondolin is, and given the numerous references to passages in the previous two volumes, makes ever clearer, is not a single narrative, however shored up. It is instead two major sections. The first (after some introductory material) is a version of The Fall of Gondolin, robust in some places, thin in others, and eventually comes to a screeching halt. The second part of the book is a more diffuse presentation of texts that deal with the fall. There is a lot of scholarly discussion and analysis, notes where Tolkien left off a particular version and when, notes where things were crossed out, changed, altered. While in a printed text, such scholarly analysis is de rigueur, it makes for a muddled reading experience when trying to follow things in audio. 


During decently sized passages without changes as Tolkien describes a particular narrative bit of the story, especially in the first portion of the book, I could feel some of the magic of the Silmarillion audio. Timothy West, the narrator for this volume (and apparently, Beren and Luthien as well) is no Martin Shaw, but then, few people can match that worthy in audio. West does a good job with the material that he has been given.


There are some fascinating bits of Legendarium here, as Tolkien has characters from two of his great stories pass each other by like ships in the night without realizing it, the honing and evolution of the story and his changed opinions and ideas about Middle Earth and its rise, and fall, and much more. 


There is one gripe I have about Christopher Tolkien’s approach and perhaps this also goes to my listening to this in audio and not reading it, and thus irking me all the more for going into my ears. For all that Christopher Tolkien comments and annotates and reflects on his father’s text, comparing it to other drafts, noting changes his father did and the like, he doesn’t change the original words much if at all (unlike The Silmarillion) . What this means, though, is that Christopher Tolkien keeps things as the original versions of his father’s earliest writings. When I first heard Morgoth’s alternate name, I thought the narrator just had a weird pronunciation of Melkor. But, no, throughout this text, it is “Melko” all the way down¹.  I found it discordant in my ears, though. And calling the Noldor, the High Elves of Middle Earth “Gnomes”, throughout the text, is not just silly, it's obfuscating. But again, as noted above, this is the consequence of consuming this particular scholarly text in audio rather than in a printed form (or an ebook).


Also, listening to the audio means that you miss the illustrations that adorn the text as well. (That is in fact an argument for the printed over the ebook version of the book as well).


So. Is this book worth your time? 


If you are a casual reader of Tolkien’s work (e.g. LOTR and The Hobbit), and say, tried and bounced so hard off of The Silmarillion that it left a mark, then no, you don’t need this book at all. It will do nothing for you. I appreciate you reading this review, but yeah, this book is not your jam.


If you have read The Silmarillion, loved it, wanted more but could not figure to get your way into the twelve volume sprawl that is The History of Middle Earth, and The Fall of Gondolin is the story that resonates most for you, then this IS the work you want (but again, I would not say to get it in audio. This is a work that audio detracts, not improves).  This volume does, ironically, provide an entree into Tolkenian scholarship for the uninitiated, a way to see how Christopher Tolkien presents and comes to terms with the variety and contradictory nature of his father’s work, and if that sort of scholarship is something you want to look at, then this book is worth your time and attention. 


I suspect that if you are a Tolkien completist, you have long since added this one to your shelves without me urging you on or no. 


I may well want to go back to Beren and Luthien and Children of Hurin, to learn more about those other two keystone stories in the Legendarium...but I won’t go there in audio. I’ve learned my lesson in that regard. Caveat Auditor.


So is this the end of the investigation into Tolkien’s work that we will see? (Especially since Christopher Tolkien has now passed on. Requiescat in pace). 


It would appear not. Scholars like Brian Sibley have started putting out their own volumes of analysis and exegesis of Tolkien’s work in the tradition of Christopher Tolkien. Given the aforementioned richness of Tolkien’s source material, there is still a wealth of scholarship that might be done. But again, as for myself, any other future books along this line I will stick to in print, and not audio.


Reference: Tolkien, J.R.R., The Fall of Gondolin, [William Morrow, 2018]


POSTED BY: Paul Weimer. Ubiquitous in Shadow, but I’m just this guy, you know? @princejvstin.


¹Tolkien loved names and loved giving multiple names and epithets to the same character. And then there is that funny bit in the appendices to The Lord of the Rings which mentions that many of the names in the book are *translated* and are not the “Real” names at all. It’s a rabbit hole.


Tuesday, September 20, 2016

SFF Essentials: Books you should totally be reading out loud to your kids



Lists like this are always a disaster: the books on them are either so obvious it hardly bears mentioning (The Hobbit, for instance) or "completely inappropriate for my sensitive/flighty/etc. kids". I'm sure many readers will disagree/object strenuously to some of these selections. And it's true, I've only read a few of them to my own kids so far (we're currently halfway through Taran Wanderer). But I remain convinced that, despite the sometimes archaic language and confusing situations in some of these books, they're doing my kids good. Do I have any evidence for that? Not a bit. But then, when has that ever stopped me before?

The below list is in ascending order of seriousness/target age (from 3 or so up to about 10, assuming my kids are still speaking to me then!)

Where the Wild Things Are, by Maurice Sendak     

I don't really remember much about this book, to be honest, except the strange certainty that it was my favorite book as a preliterate kid. I loved having it read to me--like candy for my ears. The more serious question is, should we be showing the movie adaptation to our young kids? My answer is "probably not", because the only other thing I remember about the book was that it was a bit frightening, and the movie is bound to up the fright ante...


The Chronicles of Prydain, by Lloyd Alexander

   The Book of Three
   The Black Cauldron  
         The Princess of Llyr
         Taran Wanderer (we’re halfway through right now!)
         The High King

I loved these tales as a child, enough to attempt reading them to my own little ones. They seem moderately taken with it, especially the almost-six year old, but I find myself changing the story a bit as a I read it, so needlessly archaic is the language at times. We'll see if their interest survives to the end of book five. The older kid has also seen the movie "adaptation", the Black Cauldron, which is thoroughly mediocre and even a bit scary at times, but seemed to think it was okay.

Hey, I never got a poster map! That would've been great...


 The Ice Dragon, by George R.R. Martin

I was pleasantly surprised by this for-kids book by GRRM, who after all is not known for his kid-friendly themes. I immediately began reading this to my kids, with mixed results: they loved it (because of the illustrations), and thus were spoiled for non-illustrated books for all time :(






The Earthsea Trilogy, by Ursula K. LeGuin 
A Wizard of Earthsea
The Tombs of Atuan
The Farthest Shore

This one's a no-brainer. Despite being rather sexist (a surprise considering LeGuin's later career!) all three of these books, especially the first, are excellent, if a bit dark (and thus their place in the ascending order of seriousness/target age is a bit higher). Tehanu I disliked as a child, but like now as an adult; the same goes for the fifth book. But should you show the movie adaptations (Earthsea, a live action adaptation, or Tales from Earthsea, the animated adaptation)? A firm "no" to the first, a "meh" to the second.


The Dark Is Rising Series, by Susan Cooper             
Over Sea, Under Stone
The Dark is Rising
Greenwitch
The Grey King
Silver on the Tree
I haven't started reading these to my kids yet, and thus haven't re-read them myself for decades, but I have high hopes that my rosy memory of this series is not a mere illusion: I loved them! The film version, on the other hand, is all kinds of awful, in my opinion. What's with the gratuitous blowing up of stuff scene?

 The Hobbit, by J.R.R. Tolkien

"And not for the last time!" The periodic intonation of this line (or something like it) made a powerful impression on me, for some reason, and I loved having this read to me. So much so, my parents (unwisely?) just gave me the Lord of the Rings books and said "do your best." There's nothing objectionable in the content, really, aside from some rather comical violence. But then there's the schizophrenic movies, which can't decide whether to be for kids or some sort of weird LOTR 2.0 wannabes. Should you show your kids (any of) the movies? No.



The Hero and the Crown, by Robin McKinley

As a child (and as an adult, come to think of it) I adored books about intrepid heroines (not that it was easy to find them!), and this was one of my favorites. I can't remember anything particularly problematic about it, so it should be fair game for reading to my kids once we get through all the material above!





A Wrinkle in Time, by Madeleine L’Engle

Of course you should be reading your kids this book: it'll teach them the word 'tesseract'! True, I still don't understand what that is, but I sure liked reading about it as a kid! And unusually for this list, I actually have re-read this book as a quasi-adult (~20), and found it "still good", just like the Dead Sea Tupperware from Aladdin!





Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, by Lewis Carroll          

If you want to blow your kids' minds, a) read them this, but b) wait until they're a bit older (that's why this book is in the middle of this list, rather than at the light-and-fluffy top). Glowing eyes in the shadows, queens who chop off nigh everybody's heads--it's not for the faint of heart! Nor are the many movie adaptations, in general: screen them with care, if at all. Nightmares may logically result.






The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe (but not the rest), by C.S. Lewis 

Note that I haven't included any of the six sequels in this list, and yes, that's intentional. I vividly remember many details from this book, and virtually nothing from the other six. I guess you could read them to your kids if you're desperately in search of something to fill up hundreds of hours of reading-time, but otherwise, I'd leave it at book one and tell them to read the rest themselves if they want. Not coincidentally, the same advice holds for the movies, which started rather mediocrely with LWW and then nosedived quickly. 



The Princess Bride, by William Goldman             

Holy crap, I think I've just found a book that's better than its movie adaptation! Can such a thing truly exist? But in all seriousness, the book is a lot better, mostly because of the awesome, sassy Princess Buttercup (as opposed to the Robin Wright push-over damsel-in-distress oxygen waster in the movie). Don't believe me? Go back and re-watch this film, then re-read the book, and you'll see what I mean. Yikes! How did I love this movie so much, when it's such a pale (not to mention sexist) echo of the book? On the plus side, content-wise both are totally okay for kids (in fact, they should probably be higher on this list, as below we get into some dark-ish stuff).



Howl’s Moving Castle, by Diana Wynne Jones

This is one of the only books on this list that I never read as a child (I got around to it as an adult). I sure wish someone had loved me enough to read it to me, though. What a great story! The Ghibli adaptation is quite good also, though it takes the story in a decidedly darker, war-torn direction, and it's partly for this reason that the book appears so far down the list (indicating the seriousness of its topic). It's unfair to judge a book by its movie adaptation, you say? No, it's just practicality: your kids will totally wear you down into showing you the movie, and there's some rather haunting stuff in this film that might make it unsuitable for very young children.


The Neverending Story, by Michael Ende                 

And this book is in fact the only one on this list that I still haven't ever read. The movie made a deep (in fact, a terrifying) impression on me, and I guess I never dared read the source material for fear of deepening the scars. This is by way of saying that some might believe this book is less serious and should therefore be higher on the list, but my traumatic experience watching the movie at a very young age has convinced me that concepts like The Nothing are too much for a __-year old to handle...yet also quite memorable and fascinating stuff if the child is ready to hear it!




Image result for harry potter and the philosopher's stoneHarry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone, by J.K. Rowling                 

"Why isn't this higher on the list? It's for kids!" Yes, the first three or so books are light-hearted enough, but good luck getting your kids to stop at book one. If you dare read this one to them, be prepared to suffer the consequences (not least, having a few solid years of reading material that grows increasingly more upsetting). Same goes for the movies, only more so. Actually, the first two movies are kind of crappy from a technical point of view (sloppy, Chris Columbus-esque sequential reaction shots of all the kids, poorly paced editing, etc.), but they're the only two that you can show your (young) kids without rocking the foundations of their world, and once you start reading book one, you're committing to having them hear/read/see the rest, in short order no less.



Image result for harry potter and the chamber of secretsHarry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets            

Hah! If you're reading this, it means you ignored my advice and started reading Harry Potter to your kids when they were like six. Now they're catatonic on the floor at age 6.5, having watched all the movies already and suffering permanent damage in the process. You'll curse yourself for not having cast expelliarmus on your own hand when it was reaching for the Prisoner of Azkaban, so let me reiterate: read HP books to your kids at your own peril, and try mightily to 'pause' here, after book two (which, unlike #1, didn't have a patronizing dumbed-down title for the "Yanks"), to give your kids time to beef up their psychological defenses before the onslaught of the rest!



Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind (manga), by Miyazaki Hayao

The movie is awesome, and while shockingly violent in some ways, is still okay to show kids of a certain baseline age (maybe 10+?). But did you know that Miyazaki actually wrote the manga himself--and wrote it first, before his seminal film? Manga are actually a great choice for bedtime reading material, since they come with pictures, but most manga are way too sexualized/violent/adult-themed for pleasant dreams; Nausicaa is something of a (potential) exception. I can't promise the God Warriors won't cause a nightmare or two, of course!



Ender’s Game, by Orson Scott Card

In some ways this is a natural choice for a list like this, but in others its subtly though deeply disturbing subject matter might perhaps disqualify it altogether as bedtime reading material. Who wants to read their kids a story of inter-species genocide, after all? But on the other hand, it's one of the most intriguing novels of the last several decades (unlike its sequels, which I found underwhelming as a child), and as long as your kid(s) is(are) old enough to handle the content, might as well show them the solid movie adaptation while you're at it!




Magician, by Raymond Feist 
(but probably not the rest of them, as they get 'heavy' quickly)

This is a book that could easily be higher on the list, but I remember it as being rather long and more of an adolescent coming-of-age tale than a 'for kids' sort of story. Still, I used to ride my bike down to the local library in a tizzy over the chance to re-read it when I was like nine, so it can't have been all bad, right? (Judging from Feist's recent "novels", I'm inclined to think Magician might secretly be really bad, and I was just too young/dumb to notice it at the time, however.)


Coraline, by Neil Gaiman      

What a cool, creepy story! And the movie even more so, if anything! That's the good news. The bad news: do not, under any circumstances, show your five-year-olds or under any part of this terrifying movie, and for good measure, best steer clear of the book too until they're old enough to weather the emotional turmoil of imagining their Other Mommy as a spidery monster...but what an awesome bedtime story, if they can handle it!




Fellowship of the Ring, by J.R.R. Tolkien
The Two Towers
The Return of the King

I've saved the best (?) but also the longest, most archaic, and downright most boring for last. Gasp--boring? Yeah, the whole Tom Bombadill digression in Fellowship of the Ring is uber-boring! I hate to trample on the bible of you Tolkien worshipers out there, but the series doesn't really get good until the very end of the FOTR, and more properly the beginning of TTT. That's why they're here at the end of the list: not because they're too scary (though there are certainly scary parts), but because they're too boring for younger kids to suffer through and not start to hate. And you can't raise a new generation of Nerds of a Feather if you ruin Tolkien for them by exposing them to it too early, now can you?



And thus, we have 24 books (actually over 30) that are indispensable reading materials when bedtime rolls around in your house. Your kids will probably love all these books, but take care about when to introduce them to this precious material, or your earnest efforts to proselytize your kids might backfire!

This list was constructed by Zhaoyun, Nerds of a Feather contributor since 2013, SFF lover since the snot-nosed age of five and fervent believer in a cautious approach to starting kids on a course of bedtime SFF.